Opening today’s reading on blackboard, I am more than
pleased to find that the document is only nine pages long. I start reading the
first chapter aloud, adding some flare in the form of a British accent in order
to keep myself entertained (don’t worry, none of my roommates are home to
suffer through this performance).
“Love is a certain inborn suffering,” I read (Capellanus, 30). Wow, Capellanus really hit the nail on the
head with that one. I’m beginning to think I can agree with what this
author has to say. In the twenty-two
years that I have been me, I have come to find that even the best types of love
occasionally suck. It’s hard work, this business of love. And after years of
being a self-absorbed and, to be quite honest, an idiotic teenager, I have come
to the same realization that Capellanus does on the next page: most of the
problems with love, are problems which are created in our own minds. The
dilemma with this theory though, is that I can easily argue in defense of
worrisome thoughts toward love. Ignoring your instincts can be just as
dangerous as heartbreak. And sometimes the problems that arise from
“overthinking,” should not be ignored. Perhaps Capellanus should read a little
bit more…
http://sweatpantsandcoffee.com/body-mind-soul/moment-of-sanity-what-depression-and-anxiety-look-like-to-me/
I continue to read, and before I know it, I’m
laughing—laughing at my own ignorance of course! You see, I’ve gone my entire
life believing that blind people have the ability to love, along with women who
are older than 55, men older than 60, and people who do not consider jealousy a
necessary trait. How could I have been so foolish?
http://nishanrl-journal.blogspot.com/2012/01/carl-ellie.html
When I think about it though, it is Disney who filled my
head with such lies.
Rereading the rules of courtly love, I find myself stuck on
XXIII. It reads: “He who love vexes eats and sleeps very little.” Well now I
KNOW that this piece isn’t factual. Because along with my twenty-two years of
experience on love, I have found that I NEVER (and I mean NEVER) have an issue
with my appetite. I’m thinking I could make a lot of money writing a story
similar to this one, titled: The Art of
Courtly Love: Doughnut Edition.
https://foodiegang.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/heart-shape-donuts-valentine%E2%80%99s-day-special/
What do you think of this as the cover?
Alas, I shall press on to more serious questions about this
reading. One of the most unexpected pieces of information comes halfway through
the first study guide. Reading that the
doctrine was created by women makes me feel somewhat betrayed. The Middle Ages
wasn’t a great time to be a woman. But I find myself wondering if maybe these
women hurt themselves even more by making such rules for men. I’d like to think
that if I were living during that time, I would have the guts to give up on
people who needed a list of the “do’s and don’ts” of loving another person.
It’s laughable (the kind of laugh that turns quickly into tears of disappointment)
to realize that these women had to find a nice way to say, “by the way, rape
isn’t okay. Oh and also, love is a lot better if it’s a mutual feeling.”
And after all of my anger dissipates, I come to realize that
this is the most entertaining thing I have read in quite some time. So, maybe
it was worth something after all?
Work Cited:
Capellanus, Andrew. "The Art of Courtly Love." New York: Columbia University Press. 1960. Print.
Thompson, Diane. "Courtly Love Study Guide." Northern Virginia Community College. January 26, 2011. Web.
Schwartz, Debra. "Backgrounds to Romance: 'Courtly Love.'"California Polytechnic University. 1998-2002. Web.
